This motion addressed a dispute over the sale of the parties’ matrimonial home.
The Applicant sought to have his purchase offer deemed valid or to have the home listed without the Respondent's involvement, alleging the Respondent obstructed the sale and breached court orders/agreements by refusing his offer and delaying the sale.
The Respondent opposed, arguing the Applicant caused delays and she was entitled to seek fair market value.
The court dismissed the Applicant's motion, finding the Respondent did not obstruct the sale or breach orders, and provided a path forward for the sale, including setting a new listing price and allowing both parties to bid.
