The defendants brought a motion for summary judgment in an action alleging fraudulent conveyance.
The plaintiffs claimed that one defendant transferred her interest in a property to the other defendant to avoid a judgment in a separate fraud action.
The defendants argued the transfer was part of a family law settlement.
The court dismissed the motion for summary judgment, finding that there were genuine issues requiring a trial, particularly due to conflicting evidence and significant credibility issues regarding the transfer's purpose, the stated consideration, and the defendants' knowledge of the ongoing litigation.
