The parties separated after a five-year common law relationship.
The applicant sought over $100,000 for unjust enrichment and a joint family venture, claiming she significantly contributed to the respondent's dog grooming and breeding business.
The respondent counterclaimed for unpaid rent and repair costs.
The court dismissed both primary claims, finding the applicant exaggerated her involvement in the business and the respondent's invoices had already been paid.
The court awarded the applicant $818.64 for her share of jointly owned dogs and puppies, and granted the respondent sole ownership of the dogs.
