The respondents brought a motion to strike the applicants' application.
The court did not strike the application but granted the applicants leave to convert it to an action.
The parties subsequently made written submissions on the costs of the motion.
The applicants argued they should not be subject to costs as they were public interest litigants.
The court rejected this argument, finding the applicants were pursuing a personal pecuniary interest related to their commercial property.
The court awarded costs to the respondents, fixing the amounts at $15,000 plus disbursements for the federal respondents, and $2,500 each for the two municipal respondents.
