The appellant appealed his convictions for assault, uttering threats, and mischief arising from a domestic dispute in a parking lot.
The sole ground of appeal advanced was that the trial judge erred in applying the second branch of the W.D. test for assessing credibility.
The Superior Court of Justice dismissed the appeal, finding that the trial judge gave fulsome and detailed reasons for her credibility findings, properly applied all three branches of the W.D. test, and her conclusions were fully supported by the record.
