The respondent brought a motion to change a 2012 child support order, seeking to terminate support for one child and reduce support for others based on his actual income.
The applicant filed a response, seeking to impute income to the respondent and enforce section 7 expenses.
The court found the respondent intentionally underemployed and imputed income to him in a staggered manner from 2017 onwards.
It determined that the respondent's child support obligation for a child with health issues continued longer than he argued, overriding the separation agreement's terms due to legislative amendments and unconscionable circumstances.
The court ordered payment of retroactive child support and section 7 expenses, but declined to dismiss the respondent's motion based on an outstanding costs order.
