The applicant brought a motion seeking numerous forms of interim relief including increased child support, spousal support, a forensic income analysis of the respondent, and a preservation order over assets.
The court assessed the respondent’s income based on evidence of current salary and limited additional earnings, rejecting the applicant’s request to impute a substantially higher historical income.
The court found no evidentiary basis for a forensic accounting investigation or for a preservation order under s. 12 of the Family Law Act.
Ongoing child support was recalculated based on an income of $312,000 and spousal support was set at the low end of the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines.
Remaining issues including retroactive support were left for future determination.
