The parties filed several motions in the context of an appeal regarding disclosure of materials to a detainee at Guantanamo Bay.
The respondent sought a sealing order to file fresh evidence obtained from U.S. proceedings, which was granted with conditions to allow the panel hearing the appeal to determine its admissibility.
The appellants moved to strike portions of the respondent's factum and the entirety of two interveners' factums, arguing the submissions lacked factual basis, were non-justiciable, and raised new issues.
The Court dismissed the motions to strike, holding that these objections should be argued before the panel hearing the main appeal.