The appellant appealed his conviction and sentence for breach of probation.
He argued the trial judge erred by admitting hearsay evidence regarding the self-identification of the person he was associating with, and by relying on in-court identification.
The appeal court found that the admissible evidence, considered as a whole, was sufficient to support the conviction.
The court also upheld the consecutive sentence, noting that the breach of a court order shortly after release from custody was egregious and warranted a consecutive sentence.
The appeal was dismissed.
