The applicant brought a motion concerning enforcement of property transfer relating to the former matrimonial home and temporary parenting access arrangements.
The respondent brought a cross‑motion seeking enforcement of an existing temporary order permitting overnight access and requesting additional mid‑week parenting time.
Applying the best interests of the child test under s. 16 of the Divorce Act, the court concluded that increased contact with the respondent was appropriate.
The court ordered a rotating two‑week schedule providing alternate weekend overnight access and mid‑week visits, with more mid‑week time during weeks without weekend parenting time.
Although the applicant succeeded on the issue relating to the transfer of the matrimonial home and the respondent succeeded on the access issues, success overall was divided and no costs were awarded.
