Following settlement of a negligence action concerning damage at a nuclear generating station, the defendant brought a third party claim against its lawyers alleging professional negligence in drafting and advising on contractual arrangements and settlement strategy.
The lawyers in turn issued a fourth party claim against the original defendants and the plaintiff seeking contribution and indemnity under the Negligence Act.
The court held that the third party claim limited recovery to the lawyers’ proportionate degree of fault, meaning they could never be liable for damages attributable to others.
Because contribution rights arise only where a party may be required to pay more than its proportionate share of the plaintiff’s damages, the fourth party claim disclosed no reasonable cause of action.
The claim was struck under rule 21.01(1)(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure.