The applicant condominium corporation sought a compliance order against a unit owner for alleged hoarding, denial of entry to service personnel, and an inoperable vehicle in her parking spot.
The court found that the respondent had engaged in hoarding behavior and unreasonably denied entry on several occasions, and that her car was unsightly and inoperable.
A compliance order was granted, allowing the corporation entry with notice, requiring the respondent to rectify hazards, and to restore or remove her vehicle.
However, the order was narrower than sought by the applicant, with longer notice periods and an obligation for the applicant's personnel to accommodate the respondent's health concerns.
The court declined to award costs to either party, citing divided success and the applicant's excessive allegations.
