The plaintiffs brought a motion for an interlocutory injunction to prevent the defendants from transferring or encumbering a partnership property without consent or court order.
The dispute arose after the plaintiff was disqualified as a partner for failing to satisfy a cash call, which he alleged was invalid.
The court characterized the requested relief as a mandatory injunction, requiring the plaintiffs to demonstrate a strong prima facie case.
The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish a strong prima facie case regarding the validity of an alleged oral agreement, the invalidity of the cash call, or oppressive conduct.
Furthermore, the plaintiffs failed to show irreparable harm, as damages would be an adequate remedy.
The motion for an injunction was dismissed.