The appellant appealed his two murder convictions, arguing the trial judge erred in admitting evidence from his cellphone and workplace computer obtained in violation of his s. 8 Charter rights.
He also challenged the Crown's closing address, alleged factual errors in the jury charge, and complained about a summary chart of victim statements.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no error in the trial judge's s. 24(2) Grant analysis, which correctly assessed the privacy impact of the computer search as minimal.
The court also rejected the appellant's other grounds, finding no prejudice from the Crown's address, the minor jury charge error, or the evidentiary chart.
