The self-represented plaintiff sought to set aside an Agreement of Purchase and Sale for a farm property, arguing it was executed after the irrevocability date had expired or, alternatively, under duress.
The court found the plaintiff's testimony unreliable and concluded that the irrevocability date had been validly extended and initialled before she signed the counteroffer.
The court also dismissed the duress claim, finding that while the plaintiff faced economic and time pressure due to a court order to sell the property, the pressure was lawful and did not deprive her of her free will.
The action was dismissed.
