In a child protection trial concerning a newborn apprehended at birth, the court found the child in need of protection based on likely physical and emotional harm arising from the respondents’ inability to safely and consistently meet the child’s needs.
The court placed significant weight on extensive worker observations, corroborated by psychological assessments identifying profound cognitive limitations, poor follow-through, hygiene concerns, smoking-related health risks, and inability to adapt parenting to the child’s developmental needs.
Applying the governing child protection and best interests framework under the Child and Family Services Act, the court held that the risk could not be adequately managed even with outside supports.
Less disruptive alternatives, including supervision, kin placement, and an adjournment for further parenting evidence, were rejected.
Crown wardship without access and with a view to adoption was ordered.
