The accused, charged with first-degree murder, brought pre-trial applications to exclude evidence under the Charter and challenge the voluntariness of a statement.
The accused argued that a brief interaction with police in a stairwell months before the murder constituted an arbitrary detention, and that obtaining his phone number from Ontario Works violated his s. 8 rights.
The court found that the stairwell encounter was a brief, consensual interaction that did not amount to a detention, and the statement was voluntary.
The court also held that the accused had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his phone number obtained from Ontario Works.
The applications were dismissed and the evidence was ruled admissible.