The accused, Nosakhare Ohenhen, faced a retrial for seventeen offences including assault police, resisting arrest, firearm possession, and drug trafficking.
He challenged the admissibility of evidence, alleging breaches of his Charter rights under ss. 8 (unreasonable search and seizure), 9 (arbitrary detention), and 10(b) (right to counsel).
The court found the police officers' evidence to be neither credible nor reliable, noting numerous inconsistencies, lack of recall, and potential collusion in note-taking.
The court concluded that Ohenhen was arbitrarily detained without articulable cause, subjected to unreasonable searches of his person and vehicle without a warrant, and repeatedly denied his right to counsel.
Applying the R. v. Grant analysis, the court deemed the Charter violations egregious and committed in bad faith, strongly favoring the exclusion of evidence.
Consequently, all evidence was excluded, and Ohenhen was acquitted of all charges.