This was a costs endorsement following a grandparent access motion.
The applicants had obtained limited access, less than requested, and sought partial indemnity costs based on alleged litigation conduct and partial success.
The respondent argued there should be no order as to costs because success was divided and cooperation had been shown.
The court held that costs should be in the cause so that the judge hearing the full evidentiary record could determine who should ultimately bear the costs of the motion.
