The accused applied for a bail review after being denied bail on nine firearm-related charges.
The accused argued there was a material change in circumstances based on a firearm property report indicating blank bullets were used, and a new proposed plan of supervision involving his common law spouse as a surety.
The court found that the report did not materially change the Crown's case and that the new supervision plan was deficient.
The court concluded there was a substantial likelihood the accused would re-offend and that his detention was necessary to maintain public confidence in the administration of justice.
The application was dismissed.
