Following a prior order requiring disclosure of the identity of a person who paid the bankrupt's legal fees, the court addressed the appropriate costs award.
The trustee sought substantial indemnity costs, arguing the bankrupt’s earlier motion lacked merit, while the bankrupt requested that no costs be awarded due to the allegedly novel legal issue.
The court held that the bankrupt’s position on privilege, although unsuccessful, was arguable and did not justify substantial indemnity costs.
Applying the factors under Rule 57.01 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, the court concluded that costs should follow the event but that the amount sought was excessive.
The court fixed partial indemnity costs payable by the bankrupt to the trustee at $7,000 inclusive of disbursements and HST.