This was a motion and cross-motion for a temporary parenting order and exclusive possession of the matrimonial home.
The parties, who had separated but remained living under the same roof, sought differing parenting plans and home arrangements for their two young children.
The Applicant Father proposed shared care, including a "bird's nest" arrangement or a 2-2-3 schedule, and was willing to move out.
The Respondent Mother sought primary care and exclusive possession of the home, arguing she was the primary caregiver.
The court determined that shared decision-making and a 2-2-3 parenting schedule were in the children's best interests, finding the father had been sufficiently involved.
The court granted the Respondent Mother exclusive possession of the matrimonial home, considering her lack of alternative accommodation and the parties' financial positions.
Financial orders included differential child support from the father and equal sharing of matrimonial home expenses and proportionate sharing of childcare costs.
