The applicant and respondent each brought motions for interim custody of their child.
The court considered the child's best interests, the status quo of caregiving, and concerns regarding the applicant's marijuana use and the respondent's alcohol use.
The court found that both parents were substantially involved in the child's care prior to separation.
An interim order was made vacating a previous "without prejudice" order, establishing a shared care and control schedule, with specific weekday care for the applicant and the balance for the respondent, and imposing a no-substance-use condition on both parties during their care of the child.
