The applicant mother brought a motion to change the temporary parenting schedule and for table amount child support.
The respondent father brought a cross-motion for shared custody and child support under section 9 of the Child Support Guidelines.
The court declined to change the existing parenting schedule, finding no compelling evidence that a change was in the children's best interests.
The court held that the father did not meet the 40% threshold under section 9, as time the children spent in school or daycare was credited to the mother as the primary caregiver.
The father was ordered to pay the table amount of child support, with the issue of retroactive support adjourned to trial.
