The parties entered into a marriage contract shortly before their wedding.
Following a short and tumultuous marriage, the parties separated.
The wife sought to set aside the marriage contract under s. 56(4) of the Family Law Act, alleging lack of financial disclosure, unconscionability, undue influence, duress, and misrepresentation.
The court found the contract valid and binding, noting the wife had independent legal advice and understood the agreement.
The court also applied the Miglin framework and upheld the spousal support provisions in the contract.
The husband was awarded occupation rent for the wife's use of his Florida condominium, which offset his remaining spousal support obligations.
