The appellant appealed his convictions for assault with a weapon and break and enter, as well as his sentence of 30 days intermittent.
He argued the trial judge misapplied the W.D. framework, overemphasized the complainant's lack of motive to fabricate, misapprehended evidence regarding the assault with a gold chain, and erred in accepting the complainant's evidence about the break and enter.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no reversible error in the trial judge's credibility assessments or factual findings, and held the sentence was fit.
