The accused was tried for the second-degree murder of his wife, whose body was found near a gas tank on their property.
The Crown's case was entirely circumstantial, relying on motive, opportunity, and post-offence conduct, including the accused's destruction of his wife's poetry.
The defence argued the victim may have interrupted a gas theft or been killed by an alternate suspect with whom she was having an affair.
The court found the investigation had tunnel vision and failed to adequately explore other possibilities.
Concluding that the accused's guilt was not the only reasonable inference to be drawn from the evidence, the court found the accused not guilty.
