The Crown sought to admit a statement made by the accused during a police interview.
The defence argued the statement was involuntary due to oppressive circumstances and that the police ignored the accused's assertions of his right to remain silent.
The court reviewed the interview and found no objective evidence of oppression, threats, or inducements.
Although the accused asserted his right to silence multiple times, the police officer continued to speak, using legitimate persuasion without denying the accused's right to choose or depriving him of an operating mind.
The court concluded the statement was voluntary and admissible.
