The applicant condominium corporation sought an order requiring the respondent unit owner to remove her 28.80 kg dog, Murphy, and to cease bringing other large dogs onto the property in breach of the pet rules.
The respondent claimed she was entitled to keep Murphy as an emotional support animal under the Human Rights Code and that the rules did not prohibit visiting dogs.
The Tribunal found that the respondent breached the rules by operating a dog-walking business and bringing other large dogs onto the property, ordering her to cease this conduct.
However, the Tribunal held that the respondent established a disability and a need for accommodation, allowing her to keep Murphy.
The applicant was awarded partial costs.