The applicant sought judicial review of a tribunal appeal division decision upholding a finding that the respondent was of good character and could be licensed to practice law, subject to a condition prohibiting unsupervised contact with minors.
The respondent had committed historical acts of sexual abuse against minors.
The Divisional Court dismissed the application, finding the tribunal reasonably applied the Armstrong factors to assess good character, adequately considered the public interest and the protection of children, and reasonably imposed the licensing condition based on the respondent's voluntary undertaking.
The court also continued the anonymization order protecting the respondent's identity to safeguard the privacy interests of his children.
