The moving parties sought to set aside two international arbitral awards under Article 34 of the UNCITRAL Model Law, alleging inability to present their case, excess of jurisdiction, and inadequate reasons.
The court found a procedural fairness breach where the arbitrator made a proper-party finding without submissions, but held the issue was not material in context because separate findings eliminated personal liability on other grounds.
The court rejected the jurisdiction and insufficiency-of-reasons challenges, emphasizing the narrow scope of intervention and deference to international arbitral awards.
Exercising discretion under Article 34, the court declined to order a new arbitration.
The application was dismissed.
