This motion for directions concerned the care and property of incapacitated parents, whose powers of attorney were disputed.
Section 3 counsel for the parents sought directions due to alleged interference by one respondent, Mei Chu Sylvia Hsieh, who was the attorney for care and property.
Despite a prior court order, Mei Chu Sylvia Hsieh allegedly stopped auto-pay for pharmaceuticals, withheld OHIP codes, and took the parents to the bank, leading to frozen accounts.
The court affirmed its jurisdiction under the Substitute Decisions Act, 1992, Rules of Civil Procedure, and its parens patriae authority to protect the parents' best interests.
The court granted the requested order for directions to prevent further interference and ordered disclosure of medical records, emphasizing the need for cooperation among parties.
