The plaintiff contractor and defendant owners disputed which of two quotes formed the basis of their construction contract for a medical clinic build-out.
The court held that the plaintiff's December 2018 quote constituted a valid offer that was accepted by the defendants through an agent who had ostensible authority to bind the plaintiff.
The court found that the subsequent January 2019 quote was never accepted and lacked consideration, and therefore did not amend the contract.
The court also determined that the contract was solely between the plaintiff and the defendants' corporate entity, not the individual defendants.
