Michael Brown

The Applicant, Silver Creek-Cedarwood Partnership, applied to the Ontario Securities Commission and other jurisdictions for a decision that it is not a reporting issuer.

The Applicant represented that its outstanding securities are beneficially owned by fewer than 51 security holders in Canada, its securities are not traded on a marketplace, and it is not in default of its obligations.

The Decision Maker granted the requested relief, ordering that the Applicant is no longer a reporting issuer.

The applicants, Prime Restaurants Royalty Income Fund and Prime Restaurants Inc., applied for exemptive relief from the requirements under National Instrument 41-101, National Instrument 51-102, and OSC Rule 56-501 to use prescribed restricted security terms when referring to their class A and class B limited voting shares.

They also sought relief from prospectus and private placement requirements for future distributions of these shares and class C non-voting shares.

The Ontario Securities Commission granted the requested relief, subject to the condition that the shares be referred to as 'Class A Limited Voting Shares' and 'Class B Limited Voting Shares', and that any subsequent restricted security reorganizations comply with the applicable rules.

The Applicant applied for a decision under the securities legislation of multiple jurisdictions that it is not a reporting issuer.

The Applicant represented that its outstanding securities are beneficially owned by fewer than 15 security holders in each jurisdiction and fewer than 51 in total in Canada, and its securities are not traded on a marketplace.

The Ontario Securities Commission granted the application, ordering that the Applicant is not a reporting issuer.

The applicant applied for a decision under the securities legislation of multiple jurisdictions that it is not a reporting issuer.

The applicant represented that its outstanding securities are beneficially owned by fewer than 15 security holders in each jurisdiction and less than 51 in total in Canada, and its securities are not traded on a marketplace.

The Ontario Securities Commission granted the order, finding that the test contained in the legislation was met.

The Applicant applied for a decision under the securities legislation of multiple jurisdictions that it is not a reporting issuer.

The Ontario Securities Commission granted the order, noting that the Applicant's outstanding securities are beneficially owned by fewer than 51 security holders in Canada and are not traded on any marketplace.

The Filer, Karmin Exploration Inc., applied for exemptive relief from the requirements of National Instrument 52-107 to prepare its financial statements and pro forma financial statements in accordance with Canadian GAAP.

The Filer proposed to complete a reverse take-over transaction with a foreign issuer that prepares its financial statements in accordance with IFRS-IASB.

The Ontario Securities Commission granted the requested relief, permitting the Filer to prepare its financial statements and pro forma financial statements in accordance with IFRS-IASB, subject to certain conditions.

The Applicant applied for a decision under the securities legislation of Ontario and Alberta that it is not a reporting issuer.

The Applicant represented that its outstanding securities are beneficially owned by fewer than 15 security holders in each jurisdiction and fewer than 51 in total in Canada, and its securities are not traded on a marketplace.

The Ontario Securities Commission granted the requested relief, ordering that the Applicant is not a reporting issuer.

The Filers applied to the Ontario Securities Commission for exemptive relief from the requirements in National Instrument 44-101 and Form 44-101F1 to provide separate guarantor disclosure in a short form prospectus and on an ongoing basis.

The Fund intended to offer debentures guaranteed by certain downstream entities, where only the Partnership had material operations.

The Commission granted the requested relief, subject to numerous continuous disclosure and prospectus conditions, including that the prospectus disclose that the credit rating assigned to the debentures was based on the guarantee of the Partnership.

Nortel Networks Limited applied for exemptive relief from certain continuous disclosure requirements under NI 52-107 and NI 51-102.

The Filer and its parent company were subject to creditor protection proceedings and the Filer had deregistered under the U.S. 1934 Act to reduce costs.

The Ontario Securities Commission granted the relief, permitting the Filer to file specified disclosure in accordance with U.S. requirements for the 2009 and 2010 financial years, subject to conditions including that its financial results continue to be consolidated with its parent company.

Broadview Press Inc. applied for a decision under the securities legislation of Ontario and Alberta that it is not a reporting issuer.

The Applicant represented that its outstanding securities are beneficially owned by fewer than 15 security holders in each jurisdiction and fewer than 51 in total in Canada, and its securities are not traded on a marketplace.

The Commission granted the requested relief, ordering that the Applicant is not a reporting issuer.

The Applicant, Sirit Inc., applied for a decision under the securities legislation of multiple jurisdictions that it is no longer a reporting issuer.

The Decision Makers were satisfied that the Applicant met the necessary criteria, including having fewer than 51 security holders in Canada and no securities traded on a marketplace.

The application was granted, and the Applicant was ordered to no longer be a reporting issuer.

The Applicant, Xenos Group Inc., applied under the simplified procedure for a decision that it is no longer a reporting issuer.

The Ontario Securities Commission granted the requested relief, noting that the Applicant's outstanding securities are beneficially owned by fewer than 51 security holders in total in Canada and are not traded on a marketplace.

The Applicant applied to the Ontario Securities Commission and other jurisdictions for a decision that it is no longer a reporting issuer.

The Applicant represented that its outstanding securities are beneficially owned by fewer than 15 security holders in each jurisdiction and fewer than 51 in total in Canada, and its securities are not traded on a marketplace.

The Commission granted the requested relief, ordering that the Applicant is not a reporting issuer.

The Applicant, Unbridled Energy Corporation, applied for a decision under the securities legislation of Ontario and Alberta that it is no longer a reporting issuer.

The Applicant represented that its outstanding securities are beneficially owned by fewer than 15 security holders in each jurisdiction in Canada and fewer than 51 in total, its securities are not traded on a marketplace, and it is not in default of its obligations.

The Ontario Securities Commission granted the application, ordering that the Applicant is not a reporting issuer.

The Applicant, Congress Financial Capital Company, applied for a decision under the securities legislation of multiple jurisdictions that it is no longer a reporting issuer.

The Decision Maker found that the Applicant met the requirements, including having fewer than 51 security holders in Canada and no securities traded on a marketplace.

The application was granted, and the Applicant was deemed to no longer be a reporting issuer.

The Applicant, Hearx Canada Inc., applied to the Ontario Securities Commission and other jurisdictions for a decision that it is not a reporting issuer.

The Applicant represented that its outstanding securities are beneficially owned by fewer than 15 security holders in each jurisdiction and fewer than 51 in total in Canada, and its securities are not traded on a marketplace.

The Commission granted the requested relief, ordering that the Applicant is not a reporting issuer.

The Applicant applied for a decision under the securities legislation of Ontario and Alberta that it is not a reporting issuer.

The Applicant represented that its outstanding securities are beneficially owned by fewer than 15 security holders in each jurisdiction in Canada and fewer than 51 in total, and its securities are not traded on a marketplace.

The Decision Makers were satisfied that the test was met and ordered that the Applicant is not a reporting issuer.

The Filers applied to the Ontario Securities Commission for exemptive relief from the prospectus delivery requirement and certain prospectus form requirements in connection with at-the-market (ATM) distributions of trust units.

The Commission granted the relief, noting that prospectus delivery is not practicable in an ATM distribution where the dealer does not know the identity of the purchasers.

The relief was granted subject to conditions, including the filing of a modified forward-looking issuer certificate and specific disclosure regarding purchasers' statutory rights.

The applicant applied to the Ontario Securities Commission for a decision that it is no longer a reporting issuer.

The Commission found that the applicant met the requirements, as its outstanding securities were beneficially owned by fewer than 51 security holders in Canada, its securities were not traded on a marketplace, and it was not in default of its obligations.

The application was granted.

The Filers applied to the Ontario Securities Commission for an order exempting Sun Life Capital Trust II from the requirement to pay a participation fee under section 2.2 of OSC Rule 13-502 Fees.

The Trust is a single-purpose vehicle established to raise capital for Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada.

Although the Trust and its parent meet the substantive requirements for the subsidiary entity exemption under section 2.6(2) of the Fees Rule, they could not rely on it due to technical accounting standards preventing consolidation.

The Commission granted the requested relief, provided the Trust's capitalization is included in the parent company's participation fee calculation.