Adil Habib

The applicants brought an urgent motion for a writ of possession and a declaration that the respondent occupant had no legal right to occupy the premises, which had been ordered sold by the court.

The Landlord and Tenant Board had previously declined jurisdiction after the respondents claimed the occupant was a purchaser.

The court found it had jurisdiction, determined the occupant had no legal right to occupy as he had not fulfilled the deposit schedule or paid rent, and granted the writ of possession.

The court also ordered that the co-owner respondent's agreement to a reasonable market offer for the sale of the property be dispensed with if not provided within 48 hours of the applicant accepting it.

The applicant condominium corporation brought an application against two unit owners for compliance orders under the Condominium Act.

The corporation alleged the respondents engaged in aggressive, intimidating, and harassing behaviour toward the board, staff, and other owners, including physical altercations, posting inappropriate notices, and installing an unauthorized wildlife camera.

The court found the respondents breached their obligations under sections 117 and 119 of the Act and granted the requested compliance orders, prohibiting them from harassing others or disturbing the quiet enjoyment of the property.